|Statement||[by Betty Jane Swoboda].|
|Series||I.L.I.R. publications -- v. 4, no. 1, University of Illinois bulletin -- vol. 47, no. 54, University of Illinois bulletin -- v. 47, no. 54.|
|LC Classifications||HD6958.5 .I2 v.4, no.1|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||17 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||17|
Full text of "Supreme Court decisions on labor, " See other formats L I E> RAR.Y OF THE UN IVERSITY or ILLINOIS vvo. \ INSTITUTE OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUPREME COURT DECISIONS ON LABOR. N I V E R S I T EDITORIAL NOTE The Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations was established in to "inquire faithfully, honestly, and impartially into labor . Digest of Critical Supreme Court Decisions on Labor Cases is an ambitious work to provide readers, HR practitioners, lawyers, and law students with crucial information on the Supreme Court decisions in labor cases. The digested cases are handy in tracking the recent rulings which are crucial in policy formulation in labor and employee relations. Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Coun No. , U.S. ___ () — abbreviated Janus — was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on US labor law, concerning the power of labor unions to collect fees from non-union members. Under the Taft–Hartley Act of , which applies to the private sector, union security agreements Citations: U.S. ___ (more) S. Ct. ; L. . The Fair Labor Standards Act and the Supreme Court Case. Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, U.S. ___ () A recent Supreme Court case, Encino Motorcars, LLC o, decided on J , attempted to resolve an interesting question surrounding the Fair Labor Standards question was whether or not the overtime provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act should apply to .
court would [ U.S. , ] have justified such procedure; much less was it within the authority of the United States marshal to thus invade the house and privacy of the accused. In Adams v. New York, U.S. , 48 L. ed. , 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. , this court said that the . WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court dealt an initial blow to millions of workers Monday in the first of two major disputes this term pitting corporations against labor unions. In a decision. 10 hours ago A rich, multifaceted history of affirmative action from the Civil Rights Act of through today's tumultuous times From acclaimed legal historian, author of a biography of Louis Brandeis ("Remarkable" --Anthony Lewis, The New York Review of Books, "Definitive"--Jeffrey Rosen, The New Republic) and Dissent and the Supreme Court ("Riveting"--Dahlia Lithwick, The New York Times Book . Decided Janu Locke v. Karass: Held: Supreme Court allows local union to charge non-members for national litigation expenses Decided March 9, Vaden v. Discover Bank: Held: Arbitration: Federal court may “look through” a §4 petition to determine whether it is predicated on a controversy that “arises under” federal law; however, a federal court may not entertain a.
Digest of Critical Supreme Court Decisions on Labor Cases (Years , , and Decisions) book has been released. The first batch of printed copies has been delivered and are now available for sale both online and in National Bookstore branches. Soon, it will also be available at Fullybooked branches nationwide. The book, written by [ ]. Updated at p.m. ET. In a case involving the rights of tens of millions of private sector employees, the U.S. Supreme Court, by a vote, delivered a major blow to workers, ruling for the. This week, the Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violates the First Amendment. In its decision, the Court overturned a year-old decision, Abood v. Detroit Bd. Of Ed., U.S. () and overturns laws in 22 states. The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday in Janus v. AFSCME that nonunion workers cannot be forced to pay fees to public sector unions. The case, one of .